Monday, October 17, 2016

Concealed Carry? Questions I Am Asked... Part ll

As we move closer to the election, with terror attacks taking place and the uncertainty of the coming changes in the Supreme Court and thus, the Second Amendment, the questions about the concealed carry lifestyle keep on coming.

Here are a few more...

With the thought of carrying, many people want to know how to avoid the fight all together, or they are afraid of being surprised and being unable to defend themselves.  I talk to them about Condition Yellow and use this analogy.

This is NOT Condition Yellow:
You get up in the morning, shower, get dressed, make breakfast, help get the kids out the door, their smiling faces a nice send-off to your busy day at work.

You kiss your spouse good-bye, give them a hug and jump into the
car.  Starting it up, you put it into reverse and as you back up, you look back over your shoulder and have to hit the brakes as a car suddenly comes from behind a parked car.  Finally you swing into the street.

As you pull away your hand reaches out to the radio, changing the channel, turning up the volume.  You hear a yell and look up to see your neighbor waving at you as they jog down the street moving quickly up onto the curbing as you go by them.  You wave back with a smile, thinking 'why is he waving with his fist?'

At the stop sign you turn right, the sun shining in your eyes, and you wonder at the brilliance of the blue sky as "Hey Carrie Anne..." blares through the speakers.  A pothole shakes the steering wheel and you make a mental note to call the city when you get to the office.

As you come to the stoplight, which is green, you are in the right hand lane, tapping your hands to the wheel in time to the music. The car on your left slows to make the turn while you continue on through the intersecBAM!  CRASH!  A car has just crushed the drivers side door, slamming you to the left, the side airbag deploying, the front airbag deploying, smoke and the sound of twisting steel and a racing engine attack your ears as your car spins crazily across the road into a telephone pole.  The last thing you hear as blood flows into your eyes and you pass out is "Hey Carrie Anne, what's your game now, can anybody play..."

This IS Condition Yellow:
You get up in the morning, shower, get dressed, make breakfast, help get the kids out the door, their smiling faces a nice send-off to your busy day at work.

You kiss your spouse good-bye, give them a hug and jump into the car - looking behind it to make sure none of the neighborhood children are there.  Starting it up, you put it into reverse and as you back up, you look back over your shoulder watching not only the road, but the sidewalks for people walking.  You see a car just as it moves through some parked cars on the street and you gently brake, letting him go by before swinging into the street.

As you pull away you look into both side mirrors and then your rear view mirror to make sure everything is set correctly.  When you are comfortable you reach over to the radio and turn it down a little, so you can concentrate on your driving.  You notice your neighbor jogging next to the curb and move over a little to give him room, smiling and waving as you do.

At the stop sign you turn right, the sun shining in your eyes, and you wonder at the brilliance of the blue sky as you pull down the visor, cutting the glare and allowing you to see a child's ball in the roadway, going around it.  You laugh as you think of the next person who doesn't see it and runs over it with a bang - thinking it's going to feel like a pothole!

As you come to the stoplight, which is green, you are in the right hand lane, lightly tapping your hands to the wheel in time to the music on the radio. The car on your left slows to make a left... and you wonder why?  There is no oncoming traffic.  The road ahead is clear for him to turn left.  You lift off the gas pedal, allowing your car to slow as you look around, trying to see if there is a problem. And then on your left you see a car that is swerving, bearing down on the intersection, about to go through a red light! 

You easily stop your slowing car, watching as the idiot blasts through the intersection, a phone to his ear, completely unaware of the carnage he has avoided.  You shake your head, look at the car on your left and nod in commiseration with the driver at the idiot drivers stupidity, look both ways, check the light and go on your way to work. As you do, you realize your favorite song is playing gently through the speakers, "Hey Carrie Anne, what's your game now, can anybody play..."

Condition Yellow allows you to see everything coming before it gets to you.  

It allows you to make decisions ahead of time that can not only keep you out of the fight, but if a fight arrives, will allow you to be better prepared to work up a plan.

If you are not in Condition Yellow, it's as if you are standing in the middle of the expressway with cars roaring by at 60 mph, just inches from you, your hair and clothes flapping in the wind, going far to fast for you to react - so you stay there, frozen.

If you are in Condition Yellow, you are driving at 60 mph, right along with traffic, seeing everything as it happens in real time, slowly, allowing anticipation.

"What do you do with your gun when you use the restroom?"

It depends on where I carry.  In my shoulder holster?  It stays where it's at - Unless you're George Costanza.  If I pocket carry, I usually leave it in the pocket.  But if I carry on the belt, IWB or OWB, then it goes in the basket.

What is the basket?  Well, you take off your gun (preferably with the holster attached, though in many instances this may not be possible or realistic) and put it in the crotch of your pants.

Why this guy on the left is not wearing underwear is beyond me, but carefully placing the gun here assures two things.  The gun is safe from others and you won't forget it.

What you don't do with your gun while you're in the bathroom is more important.

Don't leave it on the back of the toilet.  Don't put it on the sink. Don't hang it on the back of the door.  Don't place it on the floor at your feet. Don't leave it in your holster without making sure it won't fall out, clattering on the floor or possibly outside the stall.

Some people leave it in the waistband holster, but re-fasten their belt at their knees, keeping the pant taut, the holster perpendicular to the ground.  But in the end, the bottom line is - You are responsible for your gun at all times.  Don't be the guy who leaves it on the commode "just this one time" and then realizes twenty minutes later that his gun isn't with him.  

Not only do you hurt Second Amendment supporters everywhere with your stupidity, but immeasurably worse, you could cause injury or death to an innocent, for which you would be held responsible - both with jail time and with lawsuits.  As gun owners we claim to be trustworthy and responsible, and there you are doing your best Barney Fife impersonation.

"What's the best piece of advice you can give me about concealed carry?"

Get a good carry belt.  You will hear this over and over, but until you buy one, you can't understand the true concept of concealed carry comfort.

What makes a carry belt different than a good, thick, heavy leather belt?  A carry belt is made with two pieces of leather - or nylon type synthetics - stitched together to make one rigid belt. Some belts are two pieces plus a steel core reinforcement that adds to the rigidity while extending the life of the belt.

Rigidity is the key.  You don't want a belt that can twist, sag or stretch.  You want the gun tight to your body and to safely hold its position while you carry.  You don't want to constantly tug at your pants, or feel like you have to check to see if your gun is falling out away from your body.  Anyone who has had a belt roll over on them, twisting so the inside is now the outside, will understand the need for rigidity.

The most common reason that people stop carrying or only carry occasionally is comfort.  Get a good belt.  Be comfortable. Be safe.

Open carry vs concealed carry

I live in Illinois, so it's only concealed carry here unless you're on your own property or have the permission of the property owner to open carry.

If you are in a State that allows both, this is truly a personal decision.  There are many factors that should be taken into consideration when deciding between the two forms of carry.

  • Do you want to give up the anonymity of concealment? There is something to be said for the ease and unobtrusiveness of concealment.  
  • If you open carry, will you be a target for those trying to steal a gun? With open carry, close quarters hand to hand tactics should be practiced to thwart an attempted theft of your weapon. Living in Condition Yellow needs to be sharpened to a fine edge.  You will need at least a level II retention holster while a level III is better.  These kinds of holsters require several movements to allow your sidearm to come free. This cuts down the odds on the bad guy grabbing your pistol from you. Not only will the bad guy have a much tougher time snatching your piece, but this type of holster will require you to be well practiced in un-holstering should the need arise in an emergency.  
  • If a bad guy enters, will you be his first target because he can see you have the ability to shoot him?  This is a real concern. Many say the very fact they can see the gun, may cause the bad guy to go elsewhere.  Others say you may be the first person shot.
  • Do you want to give up the element of surprise? There are those who feel carrying concealed gives you an edge in a situation that suddenly goes south.  You have a gun and the bad guy doesn't know it? Check.  Surprise counts.
  • If you open carry are you prepared for the attention?  The 'man with a gun' calls?  Some will say the very act of open carrying should be done to desensitize people to guns.  If people see normal citizens walking around heeled, their Hoplophobic brains would retrain themselves.  Others say they don't want the attention, the looks, the fear, the cops showing up with guns drawn because someone called in a MWAG - or worse yet, someone swatting you.
As you can see, there are a lot of things to think about when you make the decision to carry open or concealed.  Think it through and do what's best for you and yours.

If you came home and realized someone might be in your house, do you know how to clear it?

While I know people who practice clearing their homes, the reality is that I don't.  The two scenarios that play out are - Coming home to a house that might have a stranger in it, or being at home and someone breaking in.

Lets look at the first one. You come home, open the garage door and realize the inner door is standing wide open - or the front door is ajar as you walk up to it.  You look at your spouse and you wonder... Is someone in our home?

At this point, your best and safest play is to move away from the home and call the professionals - the Police.  This is what they do. This is what they train for. This is the job they've taken on.

Just recently, renowned firearms instructor Rob Pincus, of I.C.E. training went to his sisters house, only to realize squatters may have taken over the property.  Pincus has the skills and training to handle this himself, but what did he do?

He drove to the end of the block and called Denver P.D.  They arrived and removed the squatters.  This was the smart play.  You never know what or who you will meet in those circumstances - so why go from safely outside, to putting yourself in danger?

The second scenario is someone breaking in while you're at home.  In this instance the practice should be to take up a defensive position, call 9-1-1, loudly inform the intruder the Police have been called and that you are armed and will use force if necessary.

Then sit back and wait for the good guys with guns to arrive.

If you have children in the house, there should be a plan in place to retrieve them whenever possible and if not, they should be taught how to barricade themselves in their rooms until help arrives.

This is the simple and safe way to handle the situation.  Certainly these are just two scenarios, but in the end, staying safe is all the matters.  Staying out of the fray is the easiest way to do this.

Would you be the hero during a rampage shooting?

This appears to be one of the most talked about situations, as far as concealed carry is concerned.  For this, I don't believe there is a simple answer.  But this is what I tell those who ask.

My job, my one and only job, the only thing I'm worrying about is to keep me and mine safe.  That's it.  Nothing more, nothing less.  If shooting starts, living in Condition Yellow I know where exits are. I know where elevators, staircases and escalators are. And I'm getting me and mine out.  Period.

Now that may sound crass to many.  It may sound cold and detached, but that's it in a nutshell - and I don't owe anyone an explanation.

Everyone has the ability to defend themselves.  As a matter of fact, it's your personal responsibility to defend yourself - not mine, not the Police, not the Governments - it's yours. 

Now with that being said, after my family and friends are safe, then the decision to take on a shooter would depend on the circumstances at that time - and at that time they may be undefinable.

It is possible that an active shooter / rampage shooter situation could break out right in front of you and there may be an opportunity to end it right there - but what if you miss and are shot, how will your spouse, your children, your grandchildren make it to safety?  Or will they be mowed down with the others?

The only situation I believe I would run into headlong, is an active shooter at a school (or anyplace children were present) where I know the Police have not arrived. Then?  

I'm in.  Devil be damned.

How often do you practice?

This is another one that is different for everybody.  In the beginning, I went to the range every two weeks and put a couple hundred rounds at paper targets.  I practiced dry fire in my house (with no one home, because, you know, it feels kind of silly - even though it isn't) at least twice a week. 

This was mainly drawing, firing and firing while moving either backwards or quartering away from the target.  Later my Son bought a SIRT training pistol - a full weight replica of a Glock 19, with a removable mag and a two stage laser trigger - and I practiced with that the same way.

Beyond practice, you need to read, Read, READ!  So many books that help you to understand concealed carry, guns, tactics and practice.  

Books like - 

  • The Gun Digest Book Of Concealed Carry, In the Gravest Extreme, Deadly Force - Understanding Your Right to Self Defense, and StressFire - all written by the guru of all things guns, Massad Ayoob
  • Concealed Carry and Home Defense Fundamentals, USCCA Edition by Michael Martin
  • Armed Response by David Kenik

Read them.  Study them. Practice them.  When you've read a book, sign the inside of the cover and date it.  Why?  Because if you ever have to defend yourself at trial, what you know and don't know may be the difference between going home to he family and living in a hell called prison for the rest of your life.

At trial, you are able to give evidence only to what you knew at the time, and how it may have affected your lethal force response. If you shot a man who had a knife and was 18' feet away, being able to explain to a jury what the Tueler Drill is and the part it plays in JOA - Jeopardy Opportunity and Ability - will go a long way to helping yourself.  If you didn't know this information in advance, you would not be able to bring it up at trial.  Keeping records of what you read can be a great help to yourself and your attorneys, should the need arise.

Join gun forums and take classes when you can.  Holster drill classes, shooting classes, self defense classes.  Subscribe to magazines.  You can never learn or know too much.

In the end, one fact is always clear to me - What I know, isn't enough.  You can never sit back and think you've got it covered. You must practice.  You must read.  You must advance your skills whenever possible.

Stay Safe and Carry Responsibly

My new book -Concealed Carry and the War on the Second Amendment, a collection from the New Gunner Journal - is now available at Lulu.comAmazon and Barnes and Noble.  If you have any questions about Concealed Carry or are sitting on the fence, this would make a nice Christmas present to learn about the lifestyle and those who live it.

Order now... "Concealed Carry and the War on the Second Amendment"

Saturday, October 1, 2016

Now Available! Concealed Carry and the War on the Second Amendment

Okay... my new book -Concealed Carry and the War on the Second Amendment, a collection from the New Gunner Journal - is now available at, Amazon and Barnes and Noble. It would make a terrific Christmas present for the gun nerd in your life!
Here is the Introduction to the book...
I used to be that guy. You know, the guy who has no clue about guns, the concealed carry lifestyle or the Second Amendment. The one who thought gun owners left their sidearm's laying around for children to find. The one who would have been quite fine with guns being outlawed. A Libertarian / Conservative who was the proverbial "low information voter." Certainly not as bad as most, but still not as informed as I should have been. To be blunt, I was arrogant enough to believe I was an informed voter... and let's face it, isn't that the worst kind? I credit my son, Jon, for turning on the lights, opening my eyes to where our Country is headed and how it became nothing more than a Petri dish for the Liberal experiment in Socialism - a kind of R & D for a future that includes a globalized government and the destruction of our Constitution and our way of life - the Founders one true Great Experiment in Liberty! Back then I wasn't comfortable with Jon's guns in my home - I had very young Grandchildren and feared the possible outcomes rattling around in my ignorant head. I was informed by my Wife that he owned (and used) a gun safe. Still, it didn't sit well with me... but I let it be. I was uneducated... and life went on. And then in December of 2012, from out of nowhere here in Illinois, our Second Amendment Rights were re-affirmed by the courts and I decided right then and there that I would buy myself a gun and learn to carry for protection. No, I don't know why... it just kind of hit me. My family was stunned, to say the least. My Son undertook my education and we talked about everything guns, about everything politics, about everything true and false about our Country and how we are taught at an early age - through our schools - the propaganda the Left needs us to embrace. And I learned. Making the commitment to own and carry a gun had opened my eyes to so much more - the only thing missing were angelic voices singing on high! I felt like a school kid and began to read and ask questions about our Country, our Government, our Politicians, our Politics - and how it all aligned with the Founders vision of our new Nation, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Once I began to pull it all together, I was floored by our Founders brilliance and their ferocious protection of our freedoms. Genius is an inadequate word to describe their work. During my education, I decided I would like to help others in my situation, that of a newbie gun owner and all that it entails. So I started the New Gunner Journal - under the pseudonym Hipshot Percussion, a boyhood hero of mine, the stereotypical good guy gunfighter who lived in the daily newspaper comic strip "Rick O'Shay", authored by Stan Lynde. The Journal began as a place for new gun owners / concealed carry license holders to read and talk about the trials and tribulations of the lifestyle. But soon, it became more. I began writing not only about guns, but quickly expanded to all subjects whose loose ends intertwined to make a sort of Gordian Knot of everything related to gun ownership, concealed carry, our Country and our Constitution. I've written about the Gun Control crowd, Politics, Police, our Government, various studies, facts and propaganda - all subjects that are completely entangled and enmeshed with one another - educating myself and hopefully others on the synergy between our Founding Fathers, our Country, our Bill of Rights, Constitution and limited government - and how those freedoms are fiercely protected by the Right to "keep and bear arms" and those willing to commit to and defend our Liberties. I've learned how insidious our Media is - in all its forms - and how devastating to our freedom people like Saul Alinsky and Cloward - Piven have been (thank you Andy!) In the end, I hope you enjoy reading this book as much as I enjoyed writing it. See, I used to be that guy. Now I'm this guy... and I'm a much better man because of it. Stay Safe, Carry Responsibly and hold close the phrase "...shall not be infringed." Hipshot

You can purchase Concealed Carry and the War on the Second Amendment @   Lulu.comAmazon and Barnes and Noble

Monday, September 19, 2016

Lethal Aftermath - Are You a Second Class Citizen?

In America, for a long time, we have continued to hand Law Enforcement evermore authority over our citizens with cases such as Heien v. North Carolina - which allows Police to use evidence found in violation of your Fourth Amendment Rights as long as the Officers were reasonably ignorant of the law. Reasonably ignorant? Can this ruling be any more ambiguous?  They have destroyed the very foundation of the Fourth Amendment in deference to the possibility of a bad guy going free.  Whatever happened to Blackstone's Ratio -  "It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer."

The Supreme Court has ruled using dogs to find probable cause is not a violation of your Fourth Amendment Right to illegal stop, search and seizure - as long as they do it within the time frame of the initial stop.  

To explain; If you are stopped for any reason, in order to detain you, the Officer must be able to show 'reasonable suspicion" - he must be able to articulate why he suspects you of having committed a crime, are about to commit a crime or are in the process of committing a crime.  If he is unable to do so, he must let you go along your way.

In the past, Officers were able to pull you over and then, without probable cause, detain you until a K-9 unit was brought in to sniff search your car.  Here is the rub... If the Officer suspects you of a crime, then he has probable cause to search your car - he should go right on in.  If he does not have 'reasonable suspicion', only a hunch or inkling, he is supposed to let you go.  Bringing in a dog says, "I'm detaining you illegally because I have a hunch, not probable cause, but after the dog does his illegal search and hits on something, then I've confirmed my hunch and now have reasonable suspicion to search your car."

Now isn't that just "spit on my neck and poke me in the eye" lovely?  Law Enforcement has an ongoing image problem and you'd think they would be doing everything possible to affect a change of that perspective.

Ever heard the phrase "Law Enforcement is held to a higher standard"?  Hell, I would be happy if they were held to the same standard as the citizenry.

How often do we hear of LEO assaulting someone, then resigning without assault charges being filed?  Can you say Officer Daniel Andrews?   Resignation or suspension - as if that equates to what would happen to the very citizenry LE is supposed to be protecting. Most citizens believe that if the Officer committed a crime, then they should be charged!  But, apparently, not the Police.

And now comes along the Police Bill Of Rights!  These are "Rights", afforded Police Officers in the aftermath of a lethal shooting. These protocols are 180° away from the Rights you and I, the Second Class citizen, are afforded.

What are these "Rights?"

As found in Management of Officer-involved Shootings by Sergeant Barry E. Roy - University of Arkansas System: Criminal Justice Institute - these are just some of the suggested protocols to be used during the investigation of an Officer involved shooting.  Keep in mind these types of protocols are in use in 13 States to date.

Under the heading The Crime Scene Investigation: 

(bold emphasis added)

2.  We need to see that the investigator is able to get certain immediate information without compromising personal, legal protection.  In many instances the officer(s) is the only witness to the event.  As on [scene] supervisors, we should get a short, basic description of the event; it needs to be the least amount of information to communicate the nature of what happened.   It is important for the officer(s) to identify the scope of the scene.  The initial information should be given orally with as little detail required to get the investigation started.(The Police will not care about your personal legal protections.  They will want as much information as they can get from you.)

3.  We should make sure that the involved officer(s) is made aware of what will be taking place from the beginning of the investigation.  It is important to keep him informed and updated throughout the process to reduce the probability of unnecessary anxiety.  - (Your anxiety is none of their concern.  Only pressing you for more information.) 

4.  We should require our investigators to inspect the weapons of all the involved officer(s), even if the involved officer(s) does not believe he fired the weapon.  “It is possible for an officer to discharge a weapon during a critical incident and not be aware of it” (Artwohl, 2002, pg. 19). - (Even though they know you may be so messed up in the head as to believe you didn't fire your gun, they will still ask more questions.  Can you imagine the D.A's feeding frenzy if he hears you didn't even realize you fired your sidearm?)

5.  Unless it is absolutely necessary or required by department policy, we should not seize the officer’s weapon at the scene. - (Your gun is gone.  Kiss it goodbye.)

7.  Ensure that the involved officer(s) is not isolated and that he has access to a family member or support team member.  The officer(s) should be ordered not to discuss the specific details of the incident with his support member.  “Be prepared for a wide range of emotional reactions from on-scene personnel” (Artwohl, 2002, pg. 19). - (I don't even have a response for this.  Do you think an Officer is going to whisper in your ear "Shut up, man, don't say a word till you've talked with an attorney!"  Yeah, right.)

9.  If at all possible, we should establish a quiet area where the affected officer(s) can be isolated from the general commotion, on-lookers, and media.  - (Since you will be in the back seat of the cruiser, I don't think this will be a problem.)

11.  We should not allow the affected officer(s) to drive from the scene to another location.  A driver should be made available to transport the officer(s) when the need arises to relocate.  The involved officer(s) could be promptly transported to the hospital which would provide a safe refuge and appropriate medical attention.   

12.  We should encourage the affected officer(s) to go home and get some rest before giving an official statement.  It is suggested that an officer(s) wait 24 to 48 hours before giving a statement. (Artwohl, 2002). - (This is why we stop answering questions.  We need time to process the situation.)

Who in their right mind believes LEO should be afforded special protections during an investigation into the aftermath of an Officer involved shooting?

If you should ever be compelled to defend yourself from a violent
attack and are forced to shoot the attacker, you can expect to have LE show up and treat you as a suspect in a homicide.  It's how they are trained and it's just one of the reasons why you're taught to give the basic information of the attack - that you were in fear of your life, point out witnesses, shell casings, anything that may be construed as evidence and then politely tell the Officer you want to help with the investigation, but at this time you will not be answering anymore questions until you've had an opportunity to consult with your attorney... and stick to it!

You will be prodded for the particulars.  You will be told that it's better to get the story while it's still fresh in your mind.  Your gun will be confiscated.  You will be interrogated.  You will take a ride.

Though rest assured, you will not be treated as a respected Brother in Blue.

Something is wrong in this Country when the protections of citizens Rights take a back seat to those who have sworn to protect us.

Something is very wrong.

Stay safe and carry responsibly,

My new book -Concealed Carry and the War on the Second Amendment, a collection from the New Gunner Journal - is now available at and in the next few weeks at Amazon and Barnes & Noble. This would make a nice Christmas present for the gun nerd in your life!

Order now... "Concealed Carry and the War on the Second Amendment"

Monday, July 25, 2016

The Opportunity to Push Gun Control - They Can Smell Your Fear

Jeh Johnson, Secretary of Homeland Security, stated that 'common sense' gun control is crucial to the safety of Americans and the U.S. in the wake of the terrorist attack in Orlando that left 49 dead and 53 wounded.  As a side note, Jeh Johnson was nominated to his post by none other than Obama.

And this from Obama, "As I said a few days ago, being tough on terrorism requires more than talk. Being tough on terrorism, particularly the sorts of homegrown terrorism that we've seen now in Orlando and San Bernardino, means making it harder for people who want to kill Americans to get their hands on assault weapons that are capable of killing dozens of innocents as quickly as possible," Mr. Obama said.

HillaryClinton called for a ban on sporting rifles (she calls them "Assault Rifles") as if doing so will magically reform terrorists who massacre innocents without conscience and commit suicide in the name of Allah.

Why do the Left push this anti-gun agenda after each Gun Free Zone. Rampage Shooter mass murder and terrorist attack?

It's a matter of opportunity, pure and simple. This is the moment they smell the fear dripping off the uneducated populace. 

Liberals - and their counterparts in the media - understand they can play off the emotionally combustible mixture of Fear, Anger and Frustration to further their gun banning agenda, while giving those so-inclined Americans a soft, fluffy blanket of false security and safety.  They know they can't win on facts.  They know they can't rescind the Second Amendment.  They know they can't use logic - because there isn't any.  They can only use your fear, your anger, your frustration and your seething feeling of social impotence against you.  This is the only way for them to attain their goal of disarming our Nation.
Fear is a powerful thing and they pounce on it like a hungry wolf.

According to The Religion of Peace, from 2011 thru 2015, there have been 13,157 Muslim terrorist attacks in roughly 58 different Countries around the World.  There have been 97,895 killed and 120,422 injured in these terrorist attacks - almost all of them Countries that have either very strict gun control or a complete ban on guns. 

And what do our Liberal politicians do?  First, they refuse to admit it's Radical Islam.  Second?  To deflect from Number one, they blame it on the NRA and sporting rifles.

They take the fear and disbelief of the sheep of this Country and turn it into a driving force of anger and vengeance towards law abiding gun owners.  

The Left, using the Saul Alinksy playbook, attempts to manipulate the uneducated and fearful masses. 

Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals -with commentary by Glen Beck
RULE #5  “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (GB - Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

RULE #8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (GB - Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)

RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (GB - Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)

RULE 12: "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (GB - This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

It's the gun owners fault!  How dare these despicable gun nuts care more for their weapons of war, than for the safety
and security of our children, our families and our great Nation!

It's the NRA's fault!  The big bad NRA, crazed with power and greed!  They lobby against "common sense" gun control!  They only care for the gun companies and their precious money!

Amazing... right?

Let me run those numbers by you again:

2011 - 2015
13,157 terrorist attacks around the world by Radical Muslims
97,895 Killed
120,422 Injured

And Obama, Clinton and Homeland Security would have you believe it's the guns fault!  It's the NRA's fault!  And the only way to defend ourselves against this scourge, is to take away our ability to defend ourselves.

Yeah, you read that right.

See through the veil of fear mongering.  Stand strong against the vitriol heaped upon good Americans who believe in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.  Make the Liberal Left pay for their hatred of all things American.

Come November, the Left should be afraid.  They should be Very Afraid.

Stay Safe and Carry Responsibly


Sunday, July 24, 2016

The Second Amendment - 27 Words That Define a Nation

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the Right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

27 words.

In the USA, these are 27 of the most important words ever written.  27 words that insure the ability of an armed rebel force to fight for Freedom against those who would attempt to enslave us.  27 words that whisper menacingly..." we will not go gently into that good night".  27 words that separate us from every other Nation on this planet we call home.  27 words that protect the other 7591 words in the Constitution and Bill of Rights of these United States of America.  27 words that men and women of this great Country are ready, willing and able to live for, to fight for and to die for.

27 words.

Those 27 words evoke more words... Strong.  Spirit.  Flag.  Noble. Fearless.  Stoic.  Honor.  Liberty.  Integrity.  Independence.  Brave. Preserve.  Defend.  Fight.  Rebel.  Loyalty.  Timeless.

The simplicity of the Second Amendment is in its wording.  There are no extraneous or superfluous words or reasoning.  It is bare bones, austere and elegant in it's simple message.

"A well regulated militia,"  as defined in parlance from 1789, meant a civilian military force, using arms in working order, functioning as expected"being necessary to the security of a free State," States were expected to defend themselves against a tyrannical government militia, "the Right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."  To ensure the ability to form the civilian militia, the people's Right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed upon by the very government they may have to defend against.

Those who suggest the Founders had no idea what kind of
weaponry would be available in the future, are quite correct.  And due to this inability to see into the future, the Founders did not restrict the arms the People could keep and bear.  They understood that warfare and it's machinations change, morph and advance, and by leaving the Second Amendment without restrictions, the People would always have access to the arms of the military they may be forced to defend against, allowing the People to fight against the very tyranny the Founding Fathers had just faced... and defeated.

In truth, the Second Amendment is much more than the sum of its words, it is the line of demarcation for a way of life as defined by either the Left or the Right.

Say "Second Amendment" to a Liberal and it isn't just about guns, its about a perceived lifestyle that is a complete 180 degrees away from their beliefs.  Their thoughts might look like this - Rednecks, Christians, Beer, Rural, Stupid, Conservative, Backwards, Selfish, Thoughtless, Racist, Bigot, Hater, Wingnut.

If a Liberal brings up the Second Amendment, a gun owner might immediately think - Lefty, Socialist, Godless, Safe Space, Trigger Words, Racist, Bigot, Liberal, Self Righteous, Arrogant, Pompous, Wealth Sharing, Free College, Free Healthcare, Libtard.

In the end, protecting the Second Amendment is truly the defense
of our Country, our history, our National pride, our individuality, our personal freedoms... our very way of life.

Come this November, America is going to be defined by the voters of this Country.  The next President will load the Supreme Court with either Constitutional Justices who will research and understand the intent of the original framers, or Liberal activist Justices who believe our Constitution and our way of life is a thing of the past and rule accordingly - and these Justices will hold sway over our Rights for decades to come.

The Second Amendment is the touchstone of our Constitution and the base that all other Amendments stand firm upon.  If the Second Amendment should fall, the rest will follow, tumbling our Country and our American way of life into the basement of history, the trap door slamming shut, never to be seen or heard from again.

This cannot be allowed.

"I want to die a slave to principles, not men."
"I'd rather die on my feet, than to live on my knees."
- Emiliano Zapata

Stay Safe and Carry Responsibly

Monday, July 11, 2016

Ruth Bader Ginsburg: ‘I can’t imagine what the country would be’ under President Trump

In an interview with the New York Times published Sunday, Supreme
Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg stated that Donald Trump, the presumptive GOP nominee, would do lasting harm to the Supreme Court if elected.

“I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president,” she said. “For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.”

I wholly believe it's unethical for a Supreme Court Justice to give opinion on politics.  A SCJ should be - or at the very least give the impression of being - apolitical. Any judge, and more importantly a Supreme Court Justice, should always present themselves as impartial, unbiased and fair-minded - they certainly should not be stumping for one candidate over the other in a Presidential election.  

Ruth Bader Ginsburg does none of this... she has no problem implying she hates Trump.  She believes his Conservative values and his view of what America should be, is beyond the scope of her comprehension and she would rather move out of Country than to live in a place where her own ideology is not the one we follow.  

Very often, Supreme Court Justices must rule on the Constitutionality of cases that may or may not clash with their own personal views.  They are required to put aside their emotions, their personal views and ideologies and make the correct decision based on what the Founding Fathers authored.

So knowing this, ask yourself, if after her outburst, do you honestly believe Justice Ginsburg can be an impartial Keeper of the Constitution on any case that may hold views that differ from her own?  After her diatribe against a Conservative Presidential candidate, do you trust she will be open-minded and unbiased when judging a case involving Conservative values that clash with her own Socialist world view? 

She makes no bones in revealing she doesn't want anyone to actually follow the Constitution... that nominating Conservative Judges who research the original intent of the Founding Fathers is a bad thing, something she obviously agrees with.

Justice Ginsburg has become so empowered by her own ideology and position on the Supreme Court, that she now believes her job is to ignore the application of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and make new law out of thin air to feed her Socialist views, proving to one and all this next election is the most important our Country has seen in, it seems, forever.  

The November election is a perfect storm of politics, with a Globalized Socialist ideology clashing with the American way of life - the only one of its kind in the World... and the only safe harbor is in the Voting Booth.  

If you want to protect our Constitution, if you want to protect our Bill of Rights, if you want to protect the Second Amendment, which protects all the others... you cannot vote for Hillary Clinton.  You cannot turn over the Supreme Court to her.  You cannot allow her to nominate more Liberal activist jurists of this type.  You cannot allow her to hold sway over our Supreme Court, our Constitution, our Country or our way of life.

A vote for Hillary is a vote for Socialism, Globalization and the shredding of the very fabric of these United States of America.

Make sure you vote this November.  Our very way of life is at stake.

Stay Safe and Carry Responsibly,

Saturday, April 16, 2016

Impeachment For Traitorous Politicians - Call Your Reps Now!


The great beauty of the Bill of Rights is this... it doesn't care what the "public" believes, wants or needs. The Bill of Rights doesn't care about polls, politics or rhetoric. The Bill of Rights is in place exactly for this reason, where Government tyranny attempts to take away the Rights of those they disagree with.

You can't get more Un-American than this. This kind of stuff borders on Treason and should be treated as such, especially when it comes from our elected Representatives.

In an article published yesterday (4/15/2016) on, Senator Ed Markey (D-MASS) is heading a group of Democratic House and Senate members in pushing more gun control legislation under the guise of "gun-violence" prevention.

“We will win,” Markey said. “We will ultimately change the laws of our country to protect ordinary citizens who are part of this wave of violence.”

This includes giving the CDC $60 million dollars over six years to fund research on "gun violence" - not "violence" mind you, but "gun violence." 

Giving money to a Government entity to help find fault with the very tool you are trying to ban, is a troubling turn that has been faced before.

The CDC has been restricted from conducting studies into guns after it released a notoriously biased report in 1997.  

These Senators and Representatives are despicable people who are attempting to tear down the Constitution and the Bill of Rights - all under the well-worn guise of "public safety." These elitist, pompous, self-righteous and omnipotent narcissists took an oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution and should be impeached for treasonous actions.

This election cycle will produce a President who will likely appoint 3-4 Supreme Court justices during their term. If you vote for  Socialists (Dems), you will be helping those Traitors accomplish their goals of changing our Country forever with like-minded activist Justices - insuring positive outcomes for dangerous and Rights suppressing legislation.

It is time for these radical progressives to feel the heat for their Anti Constitutional, Anti American views.  Write your representative and broach the subject of impeachment for those attempting to overthrow the Constitution.  Let them know you are done with unpatriotic, subversive and treacherous behavior from our elected officials.

Impeachment for traitorous Politicians!



Thursday, March 24, 2016

Clinger "Stingray" Holster Review

Photo from the Clinger Website
The bulk of my carry days are spent with a Kahr CW45 perched on my right hip at 3:00.  For my 1911 I have a Crossbreed Super Tuck (hybrid) and when I bought the Kahr I ordered an Alien 1.0 hybrid holster as its home, hoping for a quality holster at 60% the price of the Crossbreed.

Unfortunately, I didn't like the Alien 1.0 - The leather is too thin and tends to warp while being flimsy and no-where near as comfortable as the appreciably more expensive (and better made) Crossbreed.  On the other hand, I really liked the single belt clip DeSantis Pocket Tuk convertible holster I was using for my Taurus TCP .380, so on a whim, I ordered the single clip Clinger "Stingray" kydex holster from Clinger for the quite affordable price of $29.99

The "Stingray" model comes in three carry options - 0° cant, 15° cant (FBI) and a more aggressive 30° cant.  I carry right at 3:00 o'clock and prefer a 0° degree cant, so that's what I ordered.   I honestly didn't expect too much at that price, but four weeks later I was pleasantly surprised!

As explained on Clingers Website their kydex holsters have a full sweat shield that extends to the rear of the slide, adjustable tension, has a belt clip that sits closer to the grip than the slide, keeping the grip closer to your body for better concealment, completely encases your gun and has a Risk-Free, two-week 'bumper to bumper' warranty - you can return it in the first two weeks for a full refund for any reason.

The first time I clipped it on my belt I was impressed with two things...
First, it was incredibly comfortable.  I was expecting the hard kydex against my skin to be somewhat uncomfortable due to it's inflexibility, but that just wasn't the case.  The smoothed, rounded edges of the holster allows it to press into my body with no discomfort whatsoever.  And Second was the retention factor.  The gun sits into the holster with an audible 'snap.'

I wore it for about a week, morning till night, and I couldn't have been happier.  Truly a comfortable, lightweight and above all, easy to use holster.  For the first week I didn't have the time to do dry fire exercises, but when I did, I found a problem.

The holster allows the gun to ride low, but for me, too low.   As seen in the picture, the grip nearly touches my belt and due to this, drawing from concealment, I was only able to grip the gun with the second and third fingers well down the front-strap, with my little finger hanging free.  When I drew my weapon, the webbing between my thumb and finger was about a 5/8" below the Kahr's modest 'beaver-tail.'  Certainly not the grip you want when in a highly stressful, possibly lethal situation.

So now what?

I really liked the holster, so I decided to make my own adjustment.  I removed the belt clip and using
a propane torch, softened the kydex (about 5 seconds roughly 4" above the minimum flame) and pressed flat the area just below the original mounting holes.  After letting the holster cool for a couple of minutes I made two more holes using a Dremel tool.  Two minutes later the clip was remounted and I fit it on my belt.

Voila!  Success!

The gun rode just high enough for me to get a full and comfortable grip on my sidearm.  I've been wearing it like this for a while and though I still love this holster, the balance of the holster isn't quite as comfy as it was before shifting the weight of the gun higher on the pivot point of the clip.

I think I am going to make an extra hole and push the gun to the 15° cant and see if I like it better riding low.  With the cant the grip should be at an angle to get a grip on the gun, thus giving me the best of both worlds.

The only other 'problem' I found with the "Stingray" is the non-tuckable clip.  If I want to wear a shirt tucked in, I will have to take my Taurus TCP with me in the DeSantis holster.

So... where do I stand on Clinger's "Stingray" holster?  I would definitely recommend their product - its well built, comfortable and looks great - with the caveat that you understand what your ordering and what some of the drawbacks may be, depending on your needs.  Clinger makes two other styles of holster, the "Atom" -  a similar holster ($19.99) with kydex that looks like carbon fiber and has adjustable ride height - and the "No-Print Wonder Holster" ($59.99) a small, IWB hybrid two-clip holster - both of these holsters have tuck-able clips for those who wear their shirt tucked in.

UPDATE 4/22/16
I went ahead and added the extra hole and went with a 15-20 degree can't.  It's PERFECT.  The gun sits low and with the cant I can get a full, comfortable grip on the gun. 

Hope this helps...
Stay Safe and Carry Responsibly

Sunday, March 20, 2016

Trump is a Lightning Rod for America's Anger & Frustration


I will continue to support Cruz right up until it's time to support Trump - and then I will back him to the hilt.


I believe if elected, Trump will surround himself with the very best and brightest this Country has to offer, to find answers to his promises - steering clear of the Usual Suspects in DC, unless they can be used to his benefit. This is his strength - find the best people available and get the job done.

I don't think he will compromise on those things that help him get elected - his commitment to the Second Amendment and fixing Immigration - but will he make compromises elsewhere? Yes, I believe he will.  Should he?  I believe this Country needs a little compromise, a little give and take to heal the wounds brought on by the divisiveness of the last 8 years, for I don't know if our Country is strong enough to survive a continuation of the kind of fractious hate and fear mongering pushed by the current President throughout his term.

The other day one of the talking heads on one of the media outlets had an insight into the Trump phenomenon that I thought hit the nail square on the head. He believes one of the reasons people gravitate to Trump - beyond what he says and does - is the sense that Trump will not only do what he says, but in the process, will punish those on the Left.


And I think that talking head is right. People are so angry with the Left, with political correctness, with socialistic views, with being shouted down by accusations of racism, xenophobia and hate - just because the Left disagrees and fears the opposing view. Trump supporters are angry and they want those protesters to be forced into tolerance. Forced to allow others besides themselves to talk, think and dream.  They want them punished for their Tyrannical, anti-First Amendment ways.

They want their pound of flesh.


Just my opinion.

Rant Off